Jure Repinc

Digital and software freedom/rights advocate from Slovenia, Europe. Also a member of the Pirate party. You can find me on Mastodon: @[email protected]

  • 682 Posts
  • 129 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle













  • I have the BPI-F3 and it comes with Bianbu distribution by default. It is based on old LTS versions of Ubuntu with some updated packages (like Mesa) and some packages optimized for the X60/K1 CPU. The problem with this CPU/SBC is that SpacemiT is bad at upstreaming the support, they do support only in their own forks of Linux kernel and other software. So upstreaming is done by volunteers and is progressing very slowly (example only for the Linux kernel), so usual distros like Debian do not have support out of the box. Also it is a problem that the K1/X60 has some Imagination PowerVR BXE-2-32 integrated graphics and this one is not supported by Mesa and only has closed binary drivers which Imagination provides to SpacemiT and they then add it into Bianbu. Also keep in mind that even this driver does not support OpenGL (the normal desktop one). Only OpenGL ES and Vulkan. So in essence this means that the compositor/windowmanager and the toolkits like Qt need to be compiled with this support which is generaly not the case in more normal distros. Sometimes they provide two sets of compiled packags, one with normal desktop OpenGL which you then have to replace with the openGL ES variants. And these are usually not so well tested in the normal daily desktop use case.

    So for daily use you more or less have to stick with Bianbu Linux on it. If you do that, I would it is quite usable, if you do not find GNOME-based desktop it has limiting as I do, since I am used to the power and plethora of features in KDE Plasma :) It is a bit slow for some more demanding tasks like video, graphics, games and stuff like that, but yeah, for simple office usecases, it is fine. So depends on what you would use it to do.

















  • I am also gaming a lot and used nvidia in the past and by the description you give I would say openSUSE Tumbleweed is the one. It is rolling release, but they also have extensive QA tests before letting packages get released as updates so it is very stable for a rolling release. And another thing that openSUSE is awesome for is that they have BTRFS snappshotting very nicely configured out of the box so before and after each update it creates a snappshot and if something goes wrong you can just select an old working snappshot from GRUB boot menu. And with Nvidia this breakage was happening well more often the I would like. I also like their Open Build Service where you can find many additional packages which might not be packaged by distro people themselves.









  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlWhat desktop enviroment do you use and why?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    KDE Plasma on all my computers and also as desktop mode on Steam Deck. because it supports the latest technologies especially when it comes to graphics (HDR, VRR) also has best support for Wayland and multi-monitors. It looks great out of the box and it has a lot of features out of the box and I do not need to battle with adding some extensions that break with almost every update. KDE Plasma is also the most flexible desktop and I can set the workflow really to fit my desires and I can actually set many options and settings. And despite all these built-in features and configurability it still uses very few system resources and is very fast and smooth. Oh and the KDE community is one of the most welcoming I have met in FOSS world, and they listen to their users instead of the our way or the high way mentality I have so often encountered in GNOME for example. So yeah TLDR KDE Plasma is the one I like the most of all in the industry, even when compared to proprietary closed alternatives.




OSZAR »